Skip to content Skip to main navigation Report an accessibility issue


[nivoslider id=”1096″]

The military program at the University of Tennessee predates that of any other state university in the country. In 1844, Professor Albert Miller Lea, a West Point graduate, organized an Infantry Company, and a uniform for the cadets was adopted. This Dragoon uniform soon became quite famous. While Tennessee had been the Volunteer State since the War of 1812, when Andrew Jackson brought 1,500 volunteers intending to fight in the Battle of New Orleans (who never actually got to participate in the battle), it wasn’t until the Mexican American War that the name really took hold. When Tennessee governor Aaron Brown issued a call for 2,800 troops to fight in the war, 30,000 Tennesseans volunteered, including UT’s Dragoons. Their uniform is still worn today, only slightly modified, by color guards at home football games.

In 1867, the Morrill or Land-Grant College Act was passed. Its basic purpose was to provide funds for the establishment and operation of educational institutions that would have as their primary objective the teaching of “such branches of learning as are related to agriculture and the mechanical ares…” One of the conditions laid down by the Act was that any institution operating there-under had to offer instruction in military tactics. In 1869, the University of Tennessee was designated Tennessee’s Land Grant institution.

The National Defense Act of 1916 changed the University’s old military organization into an ROTC unit, and the national government began to pay a part of the uniform costs for basic students. Graduates of the corps were given commissions as Second Lieutenants in accordance with this act.

It was not until after World War II, 1946, that Air Corps training was instituted. With the passage of the Armed Forces Unification Act in September 1947, the Air Corps ROTC began a transformation which was complete on July 11, 1949. This act changed the name of Air Corps to Air Force, separated it from the Army, and placed Air Force ROTC on an equal footing with Army ROTC.

As an outgrowth of policy changes in other institutions of higher learning, the University of Tennessee Senate on April 5, 1960, established a committee to examine the Military Science programs at the university. That committee reported tot he Senate and recommended approval of a number of course changes suggested by the military. The committee also had been charged to study the question of compulsory versus voluntary programs, but it recommended that this question be held in abeyance pending action by the United States Congress on upcoming legislation on Military Science Programs.

In 1964, following the passage of the ROTC Vitalization Act, the University Senate approved the reactivation of the committee on ROTC and AFROTC programs and requested it to complete its investigation of the question of compulsory vs. voluntary ROTC. It is the unanimous opinion of the members of the committee that a voluntary two and four-year ROTC program, in keeping with the provisions of the ROTC Vitalization Act, would: (a) afford a more efficient utilization of University resources and facilities. (b) attain the objective of the program as stated in the catalog. (c) satisfy the statutory requirement placed on the University as the State’s Land-Grant Institution. The voluntary program went into operation in the fall of 1967. The committee further recommended that the University of Tennessee adopt such measures and policies, and provide such support and facilities, as would continue to strengthen military training on the campus in support of our national defense objectives.

In 1969, the Senate appointed another committee to examine ROTC on this campus. In keeping with the earlier resolution, the committee reported significant observations as follows.

ROTC as taught on University campuses is an acceptable alternative for preliminary professional education of those students who voluntarily elect to acquire a commission in the Armed Forces. ROTC has the advantages of supporting the American constitutional concept of civilian control of the Armed Forces, and provides a liberalizing education for officers entering the military from the college campus. The University Senate action of 1966 which made ROTC voluntary on this campus should be reaffirmed to specifically emphasize the right of the student to elect to participate, or not to participate, in this officer education program.

Curriculum development is a cooperative effort between the University and the Army and Air Force. Using basic guidance, the local ROTC Department Head, in coordination with University officials, develops the curriculum suitable for local needs. The senior military officer assigned is expected to function as a Department Head, acting with the autonomy normally associated with the position at this University. In the basic curricula guidance, the Army and Air Force essentially provide suggested basic educational prerequisites for receiving a commission. This practice approximates that of other professional accrediting groups, e.g., architecture, law, teaching, engineering, areas of business, scientific disciplines, etc.

The over-all quality of the ROTC instructional effort at this University is at a level equivalent to that existing in general undergraduate education. Just as in any other program of instruction, but not more or less so, the University has a responsibility for the supervision and maintenance of quality in ROTC studies. The ROTC Department at this University encourages University evaluation of its activities to the same degree that is practiced for other programs, in addition to their own self-evaluation and self-study effort. Academic credit appropriate to the course content, and time required, should continue to be granted.